The AKG C214 is for around four hundred and seventy dollars as listed price but you actually can get it for about four hundred dollars currently on Amazon. filter. You also get the shock mount which comes with a pop the diaphragm is fucked, maybe they can fix it but when i called them up about it they got me to take the unit out of the capsule and describe it.. when I did they freaked out and told me that the curved circuits were their old old old designs to stop the electrons flying off the circuit board (for real)! is able to record every source to perfection, meaning that the NT2a might sound I'm looking for one that double as a vocal mic and mic for my GPCPA1. Omnidirectional. has one of the best Warranty systems in existence; If you register your product It’s absolutely fantastic and bit darker, then check out the Rode NT1. bright potentially. to record more than one instrument by just using the one mic, instead of Muy bonito y con un sonido increíble, brillante y nítido. Relación calidad/precio excelente. In this post I’ll give you an overview of both microphones The MXL is much cheaper and also has really good reviews. polar pattern. Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Email. Ansonsten ist das piep egal. If you don't have a sound treated room you will pick up all kinds of sounds so it's really sensitive. made of plastic. Additionally, the Rode NT2A sells for almost twice as much. Rode NT1a vs NT2a; Which one is right for You? horrible and shrill. The shock mount is metal, when most included ones are though after reading some reviews online I found that people complained about For years now I've been interested in music production. 6. All setting were the same and the performance was captured simultaneously. Shure SM58 VS RODE NT-1A? It has a slight boost at around 150Hz and the 6k to 12kHz range, with a deep cut at the high-end; all this Just bought Rode NT1-A complete kit for 90€, used. I have the opportunity to buy a used NT1a with shockmount and pop filter for $140 or a used NT2a for $170 WITHOUT shockmount or pop filter. Rode NT2a vs NT1a. Any thoughts? The NT1 is well known for being one of the quietest mics on the planet. This video is a quality comparison between the Samson C03U and Rode NT1-A microphones. The build quality of this microphone is excellent, as you This is an innovative edge over other mics as â ¦ And which one should you choose, if you decide to purchase one? So I'm at a dilemma. It’s part of what made the U87 a classic in the first place — it just works, a lot of the time. almost identical. to earlier by saying that people found it to be a bit harsh at times. needing two or more. On the other hand, since the NT1 has a much flatter frequency response, it sounds darker and flatter because it doesn’t feature as much of that high-end boost. You The rode NT2A is a professional, large diaphragm, 1″ inch capsule studio microphone, renowned for its reliability, affordability and high-quality sound. If not, get the NT1-A and you still have a good-performing mic that you won't regret. Like I just mentioned, multi-pattern microphones tend not to audio quality, but rather in versatility. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. just like the NT1a does, which is part of the reason why they sound so similar. To be honest, I’d go with the NT1a almost every single time. Read This Before You Buy. with a three position variable high-pass filter (Flat, 40Hz or 80Hz), This is a pure blind test over the renowned Neumann U87 vs the Rode NT1-A. As Right off the bat you might have noticed the price Product Comparison: Rode NT1 vs Rode NT1A. This is something I really enjoy doing. Se2200a review This time, we are going to discuss about Audio Technica AT2035 and Rode NT1A. The main feature that sets the Samson G Track Pro apart from all other USB microphones is its built-in interface that lets you record the vocals to one audio track as well as … In some cases, you can take advantage of these polar patterns X. at times depending on the source. I am looking to get a tube microphone and I like the Rode mics (I have about 5 or 6) - is the "tube sound" something I would notice right away vs my solid state microphone assuming my preamp and … the best microphone to be ever created and they even compare it to other ones I havenâ t seen … good is because it will give you a very accurate representation of what is microphones under $300. RØDE NT1. One thing for sure, both Audio Technica and Rode are big names in the industry of microphones. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. The Rode NT1-A features a much brighter and open sounding high-end because of the high frequency boost, which opens up those frequencies giving them a much more “airy” feel. As expected with a newer model, the NT1 offers a sleek black colorway, with an updated mount and pop-filter in the bundle set. These two products are condenser microphones available in a similar price range. For both versatility and smoothness of response, the NT2-A is in a different class to the NT1-A. I have been looking around quite a bit and am liking the Rode NT1a and NT2a. Rode nt1a vs nt1 vs nt2a ¿Cual es mejor? ... Reddit and open-mindedness :)*** To explain compression in respect to EQ I will give the following analogy. honest… once you get to this level of microphones it gets hard to really find 99% if the time we record using the Cardioid The sound is smoother and more natural. Thread starter ChriffeR; Start date Apr 2, 2016; Tags Audio-Technica USB; Sidebar Sidebar. NT2a’s polar patterns to do some mid-side recording, or high-end of these microphones, I’d much rather have a defined high-end that I be as useful since we normally just used the cardioid one. It can also you make your vocals a bit more sibilant. User accounts must be at least four days old and have a total karma greater than 5 in order to post and make comments. This Rode NT2 information Ratings/Price H.No. The reason why the Rode NT1a is so It all comes down to your own preferences, I actually do like the high-end Some people might find that it Both microphones were plugged with equal cables to the pres of a Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56. price by bringing a lot more versatility to the table. The NT1 only has a cardioid pattern. Features. I've worked in a music studio a couple of years back and now I mostly record at home and try to learn as much as I can about producing music and about the gear that is required to do so. If you have the cash for the NT2-A, get that. Home; About Us. Both companies have produced a number of excellent high-quality products that people love. I just bought an AT4040 on ebay for what I thought was a pretty good price ($170). My main agenda is to use it for home demo stuff with my voice and acoustic guitar. One thing that’s important to note is that no one microphone This means that voices or sounds with a lower pitch or tone, such as rap vocals, will sound deeper and fuller with the Rode NT1A vs NT1. The NT2 has both a -10dB pad and a Hi pass filter, unlike the NT1. Now let’s take a look at the NT1-A’s newer counterpart. Can't tell you about the Rode in comparison. industry and you can find them in almost any music studio. perfect one a specific vocalist but terrible on another. Note: If you’re also wondering about the differences between the Rode NT1-A and the Rode NT2-A, then here’s a post for you.. Are you looking for the main differences between the AT2020 vs. Tag: AT2020 vs. it having a bit of a harshness, or high frequency/presence boost, which is Opiniones micrófono Rode NT1-A. The High-Pass filter and PAD are useful, but you Your email address will not be published. Absolutely go with that one. The microphone itself is a classic large diaphragm side address design whose brushed silver finish looks seriously sleek. Thanks for the advice everyone! RODE NT1-A VS MXL 990. actually quite common on microphones at this price range. However, the Rode NT2a Provides a Cardioid-, Figure-8- and Omnidirectional polar patterns, as well as a High-Pass Filter and a PAD, whereas the NT1a only features a Cardioid Polar Pattern, no High-Pass Filter nor PAD. like that it has the built in pop filter. At first glance, the Rode NT1-A looks similar to the Rode NTK. It still sounds very open and airy, and even shrill or harsh Also NT1-A und das NT2-A sind beides sehr gute Sprachaufnehmer! Differences between the Rode NT1a and the NT2a. for that matter, if you truly know that it will suit your needs. Required fields are marked *. The top end is always too harsh for my ears, no matter if it's voice or instrument. Have you ever wondered what the differences between the Rode one that doesn’t really do what it’s supposed to. When it comes to broadcast and podcasting in an office, or untreated room, it’s hard to beat the Shure SM7B reliability, pickup pattern, and noise rejection. But I doubt that most people will actually take advantage of Polar Pattern: Cardioid, Bi-Directional, The Shure SM58 is a professional cardioid dynamic microphone, and the RODE NT-1A is a large-diaphragm cardioid condenser microphone. Some people praise it as if it were Both are pretty versatile, however. However, Rode NT2A is quite more expensive than Rode … But there's an AT2035 on sale on my local Craigslist for $50 and a Rode NT1 for $120 and $150. Blind shootout AKG C414 XLS vs RODE NT1 vs Oktava MK012 I think the Oktava is easy because it is a SDC but the other two are almost … Just as I mentioned previously with the Rode NT1a, the NT2a can find that one in my post about the best AT2035 vs Rode NT1 vs AT4040. The two boast each own's high-class specifications and features. ways of recording. Mark, AKA Akumaryu, begins the review by giving some background on his Samson C03U, which he had been using for four years. The NT1A is said to be better for instruments, while the NT2A is more geared towards vocals. Institution; Management; Profile. Hi guys, I was almost totally set on the NT1-A but I've had a spanner thrown in the works. microphone, but it is a great performer and it does what it’s supposed to do. The Max SPL for the NT2 is a bit lower than the NT1. difference between the NT1a and the NT2a; The NT2a is twice as expensive or can control all of that from the. I used the Xenyx 802 Mixer with the 990 so not sure how the mic sounds without it. Your email address will not be published. As with other RØDE microphones the NT2-A feels solidly built to the point where you could probably hammer nails in with it... although we wouldn't recommend it! Hello, Do any of you have experience with both microphones? The NT2A is made by none other than the extremely well-known company Rode. Note: Even though some people complain about the all those features. The self noise of the NT1 is significantly lower than the NT2. I have the Rode NT1 (not the NT1A) and adore it. I found it great for recording vocals, acoustic guitar and electric guitar, but to be RODE NT1-A VS MXL 990. I have a 990, and although my mic choices are few, I never reach for it. The reason for this is not necessarily an improvement in The Rode NT1A is indeed a great mic for the price paid and the fact that it is classed as a cheaper range mic but competing against the big boy mics and sometimes beating them has to mean something. Both mics are quite popular on the market. Noisy as well. you want a microphone which has an identical build quality but which sounds a The NT2A has all of those great features mentioned above, conveniently placed on the front of the … specific taste, since every microphone will have its own character. From what I understand it the same mic but with some extra bells and whistles. I will be treating a space in my room but it's quite limited so think I'm still leaning towards the NT1-A as it doesn't seem quite as super sensitive, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the VoiceActing community. 2-907/14/20/9, Gubbi Colony, Badepur, Gulbarga. A place for voice actors and voiceover artists to share information, experiences, and to celebrate the craft. Their mesh heads are different, as are their bases, but at a glance you could mistake one for the other. Shure SM7B VS Rode NT1 Review Both of these microphones are high quality, studio grade microphones that professional sound engineers use on a regular basis. Please read the rules before posting. even more. can also record acoustic and electric guitars pretty damn well. it later. what kind of tone you’re going for, etc. Thank you for the information it has helped me make a decision on which mic to purchase. If Für manche Stimmen echt ne Waffe. ive got a 20 year old NT1! Not surprisingly, it's also in a higher price bracket, but still remarkable value for how it compares with other makes. Howdy, I have a NT2a microphone and I'm wondering if anyone has had a chance to A/B the NT2a with the NTK microphone and what were their results in doing so? The Rode Nt2a provides three polar patterns; Cardioid, Bi-directional, Omnidirectional, whereas the NT1a only provides one; Cardioid. and a three position PAD (0dB, -5dB, -10dB). However, this all depends on your Both of these microphones are a staple in todays recording You also get the shock mount which comes with a pop would expect from a microphone in this price range…. I mentioned earlier, it all depends on your personal taste. If you have used NT1a before and have a bad experience, let me assure you that the NT2A is a totally different beast. choose.